| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
1. Material Efficiency skill changed to Advanced Industry - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
If there were still slots this skill would be more useful. As it stands unless you produce very large things or are at the ckmputer the moment a job finishes this skill is of extremely limited utility. The simple fact is that a mandatory skill i...
- by War Fairy - at 2014.07.16 15:25:00
|
2. Sticky:[Crius] Research feedback - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
MailDeadDrop wrote: Noted. But please take away from this the realization that you (CCP) failed with "expectation management" of the (current) state of Crius on Sisi. I haven't spent any time analyzing that failure and therefore don't have any...
- by War Fairy - at 2014.06.13 16:21:00
|
3. Sticky:[Crius] Manufacturing feedback - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
CCP Nullarbor wrote: The industry window has a tooltip on the little blue / orange circle left of the blueprint in the center which shows a full list of the materials. You can right click this to copy pasta it into excel Adding the same co...
- by War Fairy - at 2014.06.13 14:19:00
|
4. Sticky:[Crius] Manufacturing feedback - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
CCP Nullarbor wrote: DissentersWillAbhor wrote: Personally, I would lke the BPO/BPC list to be on the right or left of the (too) large interface so that we can see more than 10 BPO/BPCs at once? Also, could you implement mutli-select for del...
- by War Fairy - at 2014.06.13 14:17:00
|
5. [Future Release] Removing Wh systems from the map/kills EVE API - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Blodhgarm Dethahal wrote: Better make this so in K-Space as well... that information is not publicly available in client either you know... If you go through with it of course... Yes it is. It's in the map.
- by War Fairy - at 2014.05.06 20:01:00
|
6. [Future Release] Removing Wh systems from the map/kills EVE API - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Vincent Athena wrote: CCP FoxFour wrote: ... The reason we're proposing this change: This is data that is available via the API but not in the client in any way. . . . Yes, it is. Park a cloaked alt by every site in a W-system and take ...
- by War Fairy - at 2014.05.06 19:55:00
|
7. [Future Release] Removing Wh systems from the map/kills EVE API - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Domanique Altares wrote: Would you continue to preemptively remove it from the API due to the fact that you dislike its presentation in an out-of-game tool, owed solely to the failure on CCP's part to provide an in-game one? This is incor...
- by War Fairy - at 2014.05.06 18:48:00
|
8. [Future Release] Removing Wh systems from the map/kills EVE API - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Necharo Rackham wrote: Querns wrote: It is the issue; we are talking about the information exposed via the API. Capital geography information is exposed via the SDE. These are two different things. Feel free to provide another example of i...
- by War Fairy - at 2014.05.06 18:46:00
|
9. [Future Release] Removing Wh systems from the map/kills EVE API - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Aryth wrote: Arguments to delay it pending a game design decision though I think have a lot of validity. Done https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4558494#post4558494
- by War Fairy - at 2014.05.06 17:47:00
|
10. [Future Release] Removing Wh systems from the map/kills EVE API - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Cue Who wrote: The only thing this change does is make it easier to PvE. EVE has always maintained a balance between risk and reward, with WHs being the best ISK in the game, why are you decreasing risk? As it stands, it's too safe in W-Space a...
- by War Fairy - at 2014.05.06 17:46:00
|
11. [Future Release] Removing Wh systems from the map/kills EVE API - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Valterra Craven wrote: Querns wrote: Valterra Craven wrote: CCP FoxFour wrote: This is data that is available via the API but not in the client in any way. How many examples of data being available in the API exist and why aren'...
- by War Fairy - at 2014.05.06 17:43:00
|
12. [Future Release] Removing Wh systems from the map/kills EVE API - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I support this change.
- by War Fairy - at 2014.05.06 17:40:00
|
13. Sticky:EVE API and Public CREST discussion - in EVE Technology Lab [original thread]
fido goran wrote: CCP Prism X wrote: Nitrah wrote: Stuff This is not data you have access to except through the API. Hence it should not be in the API. This goes for all data returned from it. The API is allowed to make your life easie...
- by War Fairy - at 2014.05.06 17:16:00
|
14. Sticky:EVE API and Public CREST discussion - in EVE Technology Lab [original thread]
The only argument I see here is "We're going to have to perform intel with people and time!" So many delicious tears. :) How soon people forgot the purpose of WHs. The whole design and purpose of WHs was that you know nothing, have nothing. That...
- by War Fairy - at 2014.05.06 15:11:00
|
15. Sticky:New dev blog: Rebalancing EVE, one ship at a time - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
There is another amusing possibility to this.... and by amusing I mean stupid. If they really do just jam a bunch of extra skills into people's heads, already trained, to compensate for the switches..... how much do you want to bet some people e...
- by War Fairy - at 2012.03.20 07:17:00
|
16. Sticky:New dev blog: Rebalancing EVE, one ship at a time - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
This is ******* awful. Ever since CCPingameTransactionandF**kYouPlayerWeJustWantNewFerrari-Gate, they've been doing stupid stuff like this. Dumbing the **** out of this game to increase playerbase tells me they still just want to fill the money...
- by War Fairy - at 2012.03.20 07:12:00
|
17. CCP gagged and moderated the protest channel!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Whats up with that? Been ten minutes now. Can't talk, no actual comments from them. Instead of talking to us, they are trying to shut us up.
- by War Fairy - at 2011.06.24 20:04:00
|
18. An overdue apology and request for parley - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
One of the little things unfixed that drives me nuts. Role management window in the Corp Tab. There is no horizontal scroll bar. There are more roles than can fit on my window. But it's ok, I can watch a TV on a couch now.
- by War Fairy - at 2011.06.24 08:01:00
|
19. An overdue apology and request for parley - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
The bottom line for me is that all of these things together make it clear where CCP's focus was. I have been against ambulation for years, check the posts. I did not truly see however, why CCP was driven for this. Look around your CQ. Your CQ,...
- by War Fairy - at 2011.06.24 07:54:00
|
20. Don't want Mindstar n' Co. to forget the Banning & 5 man rule sucks - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
Just what I said. Since the new forums have died for now and the 11 page thread with it, I think we should continue to stress that the rules suck, and that we gave very good reasons why. I don't want the forum implosion to provide some sort of si...
- by War Fairy - at 2011.04.11 04:51:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |